Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Martin Parr

Friday, December 12th, 2008

Besides a photographer Martin Parr is also an avid collector of, well, nearly everything with imagery on it. Parrworld at the Graphic Design Museum in Breda brings together some (no, not all) of his collections: from contemporary photography to lewd postcards and watches. Lots of watches.

Serving tray with ship (collection Martin Parr)

serving tray with flowers(collection Martin Parr)

Martin Parr’s professionalism is usually cleverly hidden behind the apparent outward ‘amateurism’ of his themes, subjects and persona. It has made him a legend, something which in itself would make Magnum founder Henri Cartier Bresson turn around in his grave. At least, according to the popular myth that, although Parr is a member of Magnum, Cartier Bresson always strongly resented Parr’s approach. Parr doesn’t mind, in fact at the Parrworld exhibition in Breda’s Graphic Design Museum he carefully cultivates the myth.

Marin Parr rightfully became one of Britain’s most famous photographers in the seventies and eighties documenting ‘ordinary life’ in it’s natural habitat: middle class homes, country fairs and seaside resorts. He was among them, part of them, bringing out the eye wrenching moments where things seemed more real because they weren’t choreographed but simply ‘seen’ or ‘found’. It isn’t that simple of course, because looking back on thirty five years of photographs by Parr we can say that his eye usually rests on people with very specific sensibilities surrounded by very specific objects in very specific places, caught in the specific frame of his camera.

Martin Parr, Small World (in Chasse park Breda)

Martn Parr, Champs Elysees, Paris (from the book Small World (1987-1994)
Over the years the seriousness of this original quest to document ordinary life changed into a more conceptual and disapproving view of his subjects. Parr’s photo series Small World, on show in Breda’s public space during Breda Photo 2008 is a point to the case. If you look at some of his documentary films such as Think of England this becomes even clearer: the ‘honest’ enquiry into the average people’s lives is very alike to English comedy. Parr is cleverly self-deprecating and amateuristic in his approach, but the result, far from being real, looks like a sketch or skit. It bears resemblance to Aardman’s Creature Comforts, a stop motion animation series based upon recordings of interviews with ordinary people. However serious or ‘honest’ these interviews were, the result certainly isn’t.


Lewd English postcard (collection Martin Parr)


Watch with picture of Saddam Hussein (collection Martin Parr)


USA 9/11 souvenirs (collection Martin Parr)


Mao clocks (collection Martin Parr)


Creature Comforts, What it’s all about

The more conceptual approach also shows in his collections of other imagery: his boring and lewd postcards, serving trays and wallpaper with curious prints, commemorative plates, Spice Girls food packaging and miniature televisions. Parrworld shows some of the more politically fashionable items he has collected on his travels (or acquired on Ebay, who knows) Saddam Hussein watches, Lenin and Mao Zedong clocks, kosmonaut pencilholders and to create a bit of polarity: Persian carpets depicting 9/11 vs. American commemorative souvenirs featuring lots of Saddam bashing.


Lenin clocks (collection Martin Parr)


Persian 9/11 Carpets (collection Martin Parr)

In a sense the objects mirror Parr’s later works: they strive to uncover the emptiness of the ordinary, somehow ridiculing it for it’s bad taste. At the same time however, they try to convey something meaningful about either the fact that we’re all equal in our subjective view of the world or, that no matter where you go, capitalism already rules us all; indiscriminately producing cheap souvenirs for all persuasions whether religious, political or personal.

Parrworld overview
Combined with his, by the way very impressive, photography collection (soon to be in the hands of the Victoria and Albert Museum), the objects seem to show us something of Martin Parr The Man and His Fascinations. That is, until you notice that everything in Parrworld fits together so seemlessly. It creates an irk, the idea of getting closer to understanding him, only to grasp in the end that Parrworld less a part of Parr’s person, than it is of his persona.

reineke

Great Dina!

Monday, December 8th, 2008

A guy (or: ‘pervert’?) collecting women’s underwear tags. But if you think this is strange: one of my friends’ dad is the village baker. He hates salesmen, but his bakery is frequented by them. By now the salesmen know NOT to wear a tie when they visit him, because my friend’s dad cuts them off with big scissors and stabs them on a cork notice board with a push pin. I wish I had a picture of this notice board. I also wonder how the guy from the lingerie tags archives his collection. What does he do with the tags? Great story! Teresa

P2P device – multiple use

Saturday, December 6th, 2008

P2P DEVICE

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

The multifunctional P2P device is developed to smoothen the transition from Partners to Parents when couples are having their first baby.

More information about this product will be available soon.

Claudia

collecting 4AM

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

i always liked ted talks

here a link to rives

collecting 4AM

and another link..

on internet

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/rives_on_4_a_m.html

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/rives_controls_the_internet.html

maybe not really all about collecting

but its a great site

GRUESOME HABIT

Thursday, November 27th, 2008

To add some spice to the habit of people putting their hands on the rubber bannister of an escelator, click on the link below and watch this short you tube video:

Nude escelator slide

Now you definitely never touch the rubber bannister of an escalator anymore!!

Claudia

MAKE A SONG!!!!

Thursday, November 27th, 2008

Let me introduce u to the site of a friend of mine

he’s made a song and is now collecting a 1000 different covers/versions of it

anyone who feels inspired can make a cover

http://www.cincinman.info/

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008
The redemption of the Mother

The redemption of the Mother

FLUID COLLECTOR

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008

made by Marieke en Reineke

…stick it in any moist material and juices will start to flow.Never spills a drop!

Tools for testing arguments

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

The following are suggested as tools for testing arguments and detecting fallacious or fraudulent arguments:

Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no “authorities”).

Spin more than one hypothesis – don’t simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam’s razor – if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

Additional issues are:

Conduct control experiments – especially “double blind” experiments where the person taking measurements is not aware of the test and control subjects.

Check for confounding factors – separate the variables.

Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric

Ad hominem – attacking the arguer and not the argument.

Argument from “authority”.

Argument from adverse consequences (putting pressure on the decision maker by pointing out dire consequences of an “unfavorable” decision).

Appeal to ignorance (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence).

Special pleading (typically referring to god’s will).

Begging the question (assuming an answer in the way the question is phrased).

Observational selection (counting the hits and forgetting the misses).

Statistics of small numbers (such as drawing conclusions from inadequate sample sizes).

Misunderstanding the nature of statistics (President Eisenhower expressing astonishment and alarm on discovering that fully half of all Americans have below average intelligence!)

Inconsistency (e.g. military expenditures based on worst case scenarios but scientific projections on environmental dangers thriftily ignored because they are not “proved”).

Non sequitur – “it does not follow” – the logic falls down.

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc – “it happened after so it was caused by” – confusion of cause and effect.

Meaningless question (”what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object?).

Excluded middle – considering only the two extremes in a range of possibilities (making the “other side” look worse than it really is).

Short-term v. long-term – a subset of excluded middle (”why pursue fundamental science when we have so huge a budget deficit?”).

Slippery slope – a subset of excluded middle – unwarranted extrapolation of the effects (give an inch and they will take a mile).

Confusion of correlation and causation.

Caricaturing (or stereotyping) a position to make it easier to attack.

Suppressed evidence or half-truths.

Weasel words – for example, use of euphemisms for war such as “police action” to get around limitations on Presidential powers. “An important art of politicians is to find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the public”

The following are suggested as tools for testing arguments and detecting fallacious or fraudulent arguments:

Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no “authorities”).

Spin more than one hypothesis – don’t simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam’s razor – if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

Additional issues are:

Conduct control experiments – especially “double blind” experiments where the person taking measurements is not aware of the test and control subjects.

Check for confounding factors – separate the variables.

Common fallacies of logic and rhetoric

Ad hominem – attacking the arguer and not the argument.

Argument from “authority”.

Argument from adverse consequences (putting pressure on the decision maker by pointing out dire consequences of an “unfavorable” decision).

Appeal to ignorance (absence of evidence is not evidence of absence).

Special pleading (typically referring to god’s will).

Begging the question (assuming an answer in the way the question is phrased).

Observational selection (counting the hits and forgetting the misses).

Statistics of small numbers (such as drawing conclusions from inadequate sample sizes).

Misunderstanding the nature of statistics (President Eisenhower expressing astonishment and alarm on discovering that fully half of all Americans have below average intelligence!)

Inconsistency (e.g. military expenditures based on worst case scenarios but scientific projections on environmental dangers thriftily ignored because they are not “proved”).

Non sequitur – “it does not follow” – the logic falls down.

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc – “it happened after so it was caused by” – confusion of cause and effect.

Meaningless question (”what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object?).

Excluded middle – considering only the two extremes in a range of possibilities (making the “other side” look worse than it really is).

Short-term v. long-term – a subset of excluded middle (”why pursue fundamental science when we have so huge a budget deficit?”).

Slippery slope – a subset of excluded middle – unwarranted extrapolation of the effects (give an inch and they will take a mile).

Confusion of correlation and causation.

Caricaturing (or stereotyping) a position to make it easier to attack.

Suppressed evidence or half-truths.

Weasel words – for example, use of euphemisms for war such as “police action” to get around limitations on Presidential powers. “An important art of politicians is to find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the public”

published by Konstantina Roussou on 19 Nov ‘08



blogroll

Blogs

collecting

tech

pages

categories

category cloud

absurd habits Wunderkammer event media images archiving collecting assignment Uncategorized



Share/Save/Bookmark

THE ORDER OF THINGS; An Archaeology of the Human Sciences

A ‘system of elements’ - a definition of the segments by which the resemblances and differences can be shown, the types of variation by which those segments can be affected, and, lastly, the threshold above which there is a difference and below which there is a similitude - is indispensable for the establishment of even the simplest form of order. Order is, at one and the same time, that which is given in things as their inner law, the hidden network that determines the way they confront one another, and also that which has no existence except in the grid created by a glance, an examination, a language; and it is only in the blank spaces of this grid that order manifests itself in depth as though already there, waiting in silence for the moment of its expression. -MICHEL FOUCAULT